GTAViceNews
Last updated: 2026-08-11
This page explains how GTAViceNews decides what to publish, how we label reliability, how we use AI tooling, and how we handle mistakes. It is written to be checked against what we actually do — if our output does not match what is described here, tell us.
No story runs without a traceable source. We prioritise primary material — Rockstar Games newswire posts, Take-Two investor filings and earnings calls, official trailers, and on-record interviews. Second-hand reporting is cited to the outlet that broke it, never laundered into "reports suggest". Where a claim originates with an anonymous leaker, we say so, name the leaker or account, and note their track record. Aggregated posts with no original reporting are not a source and we do not treat them as one.
Every article carries one of four labels, shown on the article itself so its reliability travels with the story:
We use AI tooling to draft articles from the sources our research step collects, to translate them into English, Turkish, Spanish and German, and to generate original cover artwork. We disclose this rather than hide it. Generated drafts are checked against the sources they cite before publication; when the automated confidence check falls below our threshold, the story is held in a review queue for a human decision instead of going live. AI does not decide what is true — the sourcing and labelling rules above still govern every article, and a story that fails them is not published regardless of how confident the tooling is.
Cover images on our articles are original AI-generated artwork in the style of the series, not screenshots passed off as leaked material. We do not present generated images as authentic in-game footage, and we do not use fabricated "leaked screenshots" as illustration. Genuine official screenshots and press assets, when used, remain the property of their rights holders and are used for reporting and commentary.
We get things wrong sometimes, and rumours that looked solid turn out not to be. When a published article is materially incorrect we correct the article itself rather than quietly deleting it, and note what changed. When a rumour we covered is later disproven, we update the story rather than leaving a stale claim indexed. Corrections can be requested through the contact page.
This site is funded by display advertising. Advertisers have no input into what we cover or how we cover it, and no advertiser sees an article before publication. Advertising is visually distinct from editorial content. If we ever publish sponsored or affiliate content, it will be labelled as such in the article itself — not disclosed only here.
Forum posts, theories and comments are written by readers and represent their views, not ours. They are not fact-checked by us and are not covered by the verification labels above. We remove content that is illegal, harassing, spam, or that presents fabricated material as genuine leaks. Repeat offenders lose posting access. Reporting tools are available on every post.
Editorial questions, corrections, tips and rights enquiries all go through our contact page. We aim to respond to correction requests and rights issues first.